> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Ruben J=F6nsson wrote:
>=20
> > Ok, thanks. This is pretty anoying in combination with skidding over
> > breakpoints which a lot of times makes a break end up in a function whe=
re
> I
> > don't want to be and "step out" would have solved that nicely.
>=20
> Use software breakpoints, which don't have skidding.

Yes, but then MPLAB have to reprogram the part everytime a breakpoint is=20
changed and when I tried software breakpoints I got more annoyed by that th=
an=20
the skidding and lack of "step out".

>=20
> I've never seen "step out" function anywhere other than the simulator.
>=20

Ok, then I don't have to look any further to solve this. I guess this is=20
something I will have to learn to live with. And find workarounds for, with=
=20
NOPs like Isaac suggested, for example.

Is the missing "step out" a device (ICD3 and/or the PIC24F) limitation or a=
=20
software limitation? I would have thought that the debugger could watch the=
=20
stack to find out where to put a break in order to step out of a function.

Is this fixed in MPLABX?

Thanks

/Ruben


=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Ruben J=F6nsson
AB Liros Electronic
Box 9124, 200 39 Malm=F6, Sweden
TEL INT +46 40142078
FAX INT +46 40947388
ruben@pp.sbbs.se
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.