On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:09:14 +1300, you wrote:

>=20
>> Why waterjet as opposed to laser cutting?
>
>If laser cutting can do it then that's fine. Laserstream didn't suggest
>another method as an alternative. I assumed, from their blurbs, that
>waterjet would be more suitable for a heat-sensitive material. Bob's
>gears show that it can be done with waterjet
>
>I'll ask
>
>Joe

Laser is pretty much the default way to cut acrylic, & leaves a clear finis=
h. Probably much more
widely available, therefore cheaper, than WJ.=20

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.