> Can someone shed some light on this? Jal author (Wouter),

I am no longer involved in the compiler development.

This seems not a compiler issue to me, more a library issue. Think: the=20
TRIS instruction is not something a compiler will generate to implement=20
a specific HLL construct.

If there are any chips that really don't implement (as opposed to just=20
don't mention) TRIS it would be interesting to check what the libraries=20
use for those chips.

When I was involved in the compiler, TRIS was documented for all chips I=20
targeted. So it was valid, and it still is for those chips. I checked=20
12F629, it is still there.

I dunno what Kyle (he current compiler author) does, but way back I=20
always ran the generated asm text through MPASM, and comared the result=20
with the directly-generated .hex. Always a full match.

You could ask this on the jallist, more chance that the compiler and/or=20
library developers read it.

--=20

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products
docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu
C++ on uC blog: http://www.voti.nl/erblog

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.