I've done some Android programming, with the usual Java method. That =20 took some time to come up to speed with, but is very =20 powerful/complete. I also used Google's own App Inventor =20 (visual/graphical programming for Android), but they have retired it =20 recently and made it open source. It will apparently be back by MIT, =20 but not sure how good it will be for a production project. There are other options (BASIC, etc), but I understand there are =20 limitations. Then there is the native C route, for which docs are not =20 easy to come by. I know a number of full-time Android app developers =20 and they all choose Java. Cheers, -Neil. Quoting RussellMc : > I'm sure Mr Gargoyle has lots to say on this subject but the answer > can be subtly complex. > I'm hoping Mr PICList has more distilled wisdom. > > I'm looking for an entry method to Android "smartphone" programming > which requires the minimum possible > > MUST be Android. > > - learning > - effort > - time to "hello world" level programming involved > > Take it home this evening, be running programs by bedtime* ... would > be acceptable. > (* today!) > > for > > (i) An intelligent person with minimal exposure to computer > languages or programming > (Maybe a Doctor, Lawyer, Artist, Mechanic, ...) > > (ii) An intelligent person with good genera programming > concepts but with > no language knowledge assumptions made. > (eg they may be a genius in System 360 assembler but have no > other programming exposure) > > (So it's "EASY", it's just like C/C++/Java/BASIC/Forth/ ... is meaningles= s) > > Being free is not essential but is highly desirable. > The solution can obviously sacrifice functionality and speed of > execution for simplicity. > > > Russell > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .