Coincidently, I've been moving to simpler measures such as custom make/cmake files and a text editor and a terminal. But I also like mplab because of the debugger features and real ice integration. On Sunday, 29 January 2012, Oli Glaser wrote: > Thanks for all the replies. > > I may give it another go - I do quite a bit of development in Eclipse > (Android, ARM, etc) and Visual Studio so I am pretty used to the > powerful features that are present in such tools. MPLAB is beginning to > feel more and more dated in this regard, though I kinda like it anyway > as it's solid and "no fuss". > I guess it's a case of what you are used to, but based on the replies, > and since MPLABX is based around Eclipse, plus the fact you can use the > same source for both MPLAB/MPLABX, I get the feeling it should be pretty > painless to get up to speed. > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .