Harold Hallikainen wrote 2012-01-20 01:50:
>
>>
>> Sounds like RMW to me too, given that it's the first LED (in the code)
>> that doesn't turn on. For any fast port manipulations use the dedicated
>> atomic registers (as you have done with LATGSET, etc in the other test)
>>
>
> I agree that it's RMW. You can, of course, use the atomic instructions
> (set and clear), or just do what you're doing, but use LAT instead of POR=
T
> for any output. I always use LAT for output and PORT for input. This was =
a
> great improvement of the PIC18 over the PIC16.

And now also parts of the "enhanced" PIC16F1xxx architecture.

Jan-Erik.


>
> Harold
>
>
>
>
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.