On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:34 AM, c h wrote: > A good PC at the development time, I think. Later you could analyze > the bottlenecks and choose the appropriate hardware configuration. This is by no means an uncommon application, file and webserver. I think the bottlenecks are already known to server administrators/whomever. > Posgresql should be placed on a separate hardware, I believe. The load on the database daemon will be relatively light. It is not a database intensive task - but I'll keep this in mind. --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .