RussellMc wrote:
> I consider the portions
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "slight voltage shift"
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "cause big current change" and
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "(burn out will happen)"
>
> occurring together are proof enough of plagiarism.
>

Wanna kick non-native English writers off the Internet? :-)  They, due
to the lack of command of the Language are doomed to using this or
that word combination they once had learned to. On a long run, of
course, just by the theory of probability, you'll find some clusters
of the combination resembling the clusters in other sourses. Try to
write a book in Chinese and not to "plagiarise" some word combination.

Anyway, before announcing the verdict "proof enough of plagiarism", it
would make sense to ask the defendant whether they have any prove that
they wrote their text before the "original" text was written, like
drafts saved in the cloud, ids and dates of the emails sent with the
text, etc etc.

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.