jana1972@centrum.cz wrote 2011-11-03 13:18: > I am a newbie with ICD3 debugger and also with ICD header. > As I needed to debug PIC16F628A I had to buy the header file with > PIC16F648A. > Does it mean that PIC16F648A was programmed so that it consist of ALL fu= nctions of > PIC16F628A ? > In other words is it not nescessary to use, during the development, > PIC16F628A in my > design? > But to use only the header file with PIC16F648A instead? > And only after the code is without errors and debugged , I will program > the code into > PIC16F628A? Yes, as long as you do not use anything that the 628A doesn't have. Mostly memory in the 2-4 kWord area. Note that the docs specificaly says that you can use that header to debug code for 627A, 628A and 648A. Don't you trust the docs ? > Or must I use, during development both PIC16F648A and PIC16F628A? > Thanks > L. --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .