Both chips are good. But I would like to point to something different ; A while ago I was porting one of my applications to FPGA, I also needed to port camera (usb webcam) as well. First version of the project was dependent on a pc to harness computing power and I was planning on building a standalone version. Anyway, IMO this is a HUGE problem with current programmable arrays because itself doesn't work as a usb host, it is a client as well (like the webcam). Of course it can, if one sits and codes the entire usb protocol in it - which is a waste of time to me. There are various workarounds but none of them are efficient. So as far as I read, FPGA can be interfaced to FT232H and this chip can act as a usb host ? FPGA should only read the -data- and the chip will handle the political stuff (handshaking, protocol initialization etc.). If this is how I get it, this is one of the best monday's I've ever had! On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 7:47 AM, V G wrote: > Hi all, > > Now that I know how to transfer to the computer at high speeds (via > FT232H), and have some solid FPGA groundwork down, I'm trying to make an > analog signal analyzer with a parallel interface ADC. I'm looking to samp= le > signals no more then 1MHz (and at most up to 5V), so I thought I'd choose= a > part of at least 5MSPS. > > http://www.linear.com/product/LTC1405 > > This chip looks good. Not too expensive, 12 bit, 5MSPS, simple parallel > interface. But it also says 100MHz full power bandwidth sampling. I don't > understand, if it can sample at 5MSPS, how can it sample a 100MHz signal? > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .