> Sorry about the prior empty post. Accidently sent.
>=20
> I am guessing the high bandwidth is to support "equivalent time sampling"=
,=20
> although with a Tacq of 50ns it would seem you could only go to about 20M=
Hz.
>=20
>=20

To me, it seems obvious that you can sample a repetitive wave of pretty muc=
h any frequency by phase shifting your sample clock by tiny increments.=20

Is this what they're saying?=20

So, if the signal is non repetitive, their 100MHz number is void?
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.