At 23.57 2011.10.24, you wrote:
>Actually, SPDIP is 'skinny' DIP, .1" spacing like any other DIP, but the=20
>rows are .3" apart, instead of .6" like a 'normal' 28 pin DIP.  Quite=20
>'breadboard-friendly'.

I'm pretty sure I saw SDIP with smaller spacing.. however I'm glad you're r=
ight
at the very least on this PIC32 issue, I checked the datasheet and it's ind=
eed
0.100 as you wrote, so these PIC32 become very hobbyst friendly.

Meanwhile I have coded more for them (in assembly and in C) and I must say =
I am
more and more impressed by the ease (in asm) and power of these "little" MP=
U's.

Cheers,
Mario


>
>Kerry
>
>
>Electron wrote:
>> PS: datasheet:
>> http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/61168B.pdf
>>
>> Please notice they are SPDIP, not DIP (pitch is not the classic=20
>breadboard-friendly 0.100 inches).
>>
>>
>>  =20
>>> At 19.37 2011.10.24, you wrote:
>>>    =20
>>>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Electron <electron2k4@infinito.it> wr=
ote:
>>>>
>>>>      =20
>>>>> They are going to release SDIP low pin count (>=3D28 pin IIRC) PIC32'=
s soon,
>>>>> so it'll become even more interesting.
>>>>>        =20
>>>> Do you have any details/references for this?
>>>>      =20
>>> Uh, Microchip site, the first 12 from this chart:
>>> http://www.microchip.com/ParamChartSearch/chart.aspx?branchID=3D211&mid=
=3D
>>> 10&lang=3Den&pageId=3D74
>>>
>>> Looks like "future product" meanwhile became "in production" for half=20
>>> of them already, e.g.:
>>> http://www.microchip.com/wwwproducts/Devices.aspx?dDocName=3Den556007
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Mario
>>>
>>>    =20
>>
>>  =20
>
>--=20
>http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
>View/change your membership options at
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.