At 11.06 2011.10.17, you wrote:
>Veronica Merryfield <veronica.merryfield <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> That detail is in the ARM Architecture Reference Manual which is availab=
le
>> from
>
>Thanks for posting that. Unfortunately, that is not entirely correct. ARM
>binaries are not portable between different ARM cpus, even between those w=
hich
>claim to be of the same 'family'. The devil is in the details, as they say=
.. And
>it is not just IO addresses and accessing modes, as far as I could see so =
far.
>ARM code is portable as long as it is written in C or higher level assembl=
y
>apparently, and can be built for the specific target cpu.

This is true only for coprocessor instructions as far as I know, and even m=
akes
perfect sense.

Cheers,
Mario

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.