> I believe PDP11 fails modern RISC tests because it uses a memory/
> register architecture for most operations, and supports double memory
> operands as well.  But I've also been surprised that no one has simply
> duplicated a PDP11-on-a-chip (not counting DEC themselves.) (I guess
> that 64k address space is a bit quaint these days...)

I think it was Fairchild who were making a PDP-on-a-chip - but I think it u=
sed the PDP-8 architecture. AFAIK it never made it to market, although I di=
d see marketing literature.=20


--=20
Scanned by iCritical.

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.