At 11:04 PM 10/14/2011, V G wrote: >On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Jesse Lackey=20 >wrote: > > > This may be a dumb suggestion, but why not use some regular computer > > laptop/desktop SDRAM in a SIMM module? It could be older very generic > > stuff that sure seems likely to be supported by xilinx's software. > > Physically too big? > > > > You could ask on a xilinx forum about the DRAMs from mouser, you'd be > > much more likely to find that guy that knows it will work. > > > > >I like the parallel processing of FPGAs. I guess that I just became extremely confused. Sort of like . . . HUH ?!? What does using or not using SIMM SDRAM have to do with parallel=20 processing? I *think* that those old SIMMs are 16 bits wide (18 bits=20 if they have parity). You could also use the cache RAM from really old computer mother-boards. I'm not trying to start a confrontation - I'm genuinely=20 confused. Can you explain? dwayne --=20 Dwayne Reid Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd Edmonton, AB, CANADA (780) 489-3199 voice (780) 487-6397 fax www.trinity-electronics.com Custom Electronics Design and Manufacturing --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .