Personally I tend to use C++ even for embedded stuff in a professional capacity nowadays - though I'm generally talking about more complex processors than PICs in that case. Or were you suggesting the use of something not related to C at all (which is in reality unlikely - languages like Java surely owe a lot to C)? Chris On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Sean Breheny wrote: > Are those other forums related to programming for embedded systems or > more application development? My experience is that C is very much > alive and well in the embedded realm but much less common now in the > application development field. > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Barry Gershenfeld w= rote: >> On other forums, the guys are reminiscing about the good old days when t= hey >> used to use C. =A0I guess that makes us special, those of us who use it >> currently. >> -- >> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive >> View/change your membership options at >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist >> > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .