On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:03 AM, V G wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:16 AM, RussellMc wrote: > >> He gives the impression of being drunk, insane or trying to get a >> reaction. >> > Oh wow, I finally understand the confusion here. I can understand how the timeline of events could lead to a certain thought process forming in some of your heads. Okay let me clear this up. 1. I am not drunk. 2. I'd like to think I'm not insane. 3. About the youtube video, yes I did want to see some responses. I found i= t randomly while browsing reddit and I thought I'd post it here. This video has nothing to do with anything. 4. He did time for a previous crime - I posted that just to see what people thought. The full thread is on reddit and the MAJORITY of people agree with me. Please see for yourselves. 5. The video was to get some sort of a reaction. I wanted to see what the responses were here (from a psychological point of view, since this is a different set of samples than the people who browse reddit). I admit that. But what's wrong with the video? Which rule does it break? It was OT, so wh= y not? 6. I am not hurt. I posted the thread about the indirect attacks after noticing it going on a lot. Why would I be hurt? None of them were towards me, and this is a mailing list. How would a mailing list hurt anyone? That thread had nothing to do with the video or anything. It was completely separate of anything else. It was just me noticing the behavior. I'm also majoring in psych, among 3 other things, so I sometimes use certain "psych tests" unintentionally here to test the psych phenomenon I learn. 7. I posted all those messages before I received a single message from Bob. The times must be a little off - propagation delay or something like that. 8. This does not need a separate topic? 9. Troubled youth? Seriously man? I never knew there was this much elitism here. Damn... --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .