On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Herbert Graf wrote:

>> Only downside I can see is that it's OTP

That and the package.  I think I'd be willing to work with an OTP if =20
it didn't also require soldering to and using up a PCB for each =20
iteration (or each couple iterations.)  $95 sockets are not a =20
solution...

Are there any similar devices with better "usability"?  I often wished =20
for some simple PLD-like device in a low-pin-count package with some =20
'fixed' and buried functionality like these seem to have (counters, =20
etc), but the low-pin-count devices seem to be very 'one generic =20
macrocell per pin', and the embedded higher level functions don't show =20
up till you get to the high pin count parts.

BillW

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.