On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Dave Tweed wrote: >> I gathered, perhaps incorrectly, that the guy is extremely smart at the = GPS >> and RF portions, maybe not quite as much so on the FPGA side. Or maybe h= e >> just didn't have enough time to devote to the FPGA portion? > > Actually, he states explicitly that he only had room for the four correla= tor > channels in the FPGA. This is the same FPGA that is synthesizing the loca= l > oscillator for the RF board. He's simply reusing hardware that he had > developed previously. > He goes on to say that he could possibly improve it by multiplexing channels. Either way the FPGA portion is not ideal, but defaming him wasn't my intent. I was just saying that there's room for improvement. (obviously, you may say.) --=20 Martin K. --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .