> It's a press release from the software analysis company. =A0Wonder how th=
ey
> counted the bugs and how many actually could affect the "research accurac=
y".

Yes.
It seemed a shame to spoil a good story :-)
But, it does make the point that software is usually less than
methodical and consistent and that maximising these atytributes may
[tm] be a good idea where rigor is required.

I initially misread their heading and though that they were sending
their software to Coventry :-).



         R

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.