Challenges to the theory that the speed of light is neither a maximum or=20
a constant figure seem to pop up occasionally. The sources are reputable=20
but I never hear anything that disproves the challenges. There is=20
something about the question yet to be explained. The last time I tried=20
to understand the challenge it was in regard to computing wave guide=20
dimensions. I never quite grasp what is really going on. Maybe someone=20
really smart will be able to solve the puzzle with this new piece.

If time and the speed of light are not constant but bear the same=20
relationship as time domain and frequency domain, could it be that=20
relationship of time and the speed of light have a constant relationship?

Never mind, I am babbling this morning, more coffee needed...

On 9/22/2011 4:02 PM, Carey Fisher wrote:
> This MAY be really important!!!  If validated, a major part of physics wi=
ll
> have to be re-thought.  It would be fascinating to see such a change in m=
y
> lifetime.
>
> *http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15017484*
>
> Carey Fisher
> Chief Technical Officer
> New Communications Solutions, LLC
> 678-999-3956
> careyfisher@ncsradio.com

--=20
John Ferrell W8CCW
   "Until one has loved an animal,
     part of their soul remains unawakened."



--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.