On 19/09/2011 14:29, M.L. wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 7:34 PM, V G wrote: >> Still doesn't change the fact that it's crap. Why make that stupid 0.05" >> offset in the first place? It's wayyyy too expensive for what it is. Als= o, >> why are they using an AVR? Low availability, more expensive than it shou= ld >> be, etc. > Then don't f'ing buy it! > LOL! Can't argue with that logic... :-) --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .