Em 18/9/2011 13:38, David Harmon escreveu: > On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 12:37:40 +1200, IVP > wrote: > >>> Point is - the researcher shouldn't be relying on his little knowledge >>> of the subject and the use of an Arduino for any serious research >>> due to the variables he didn't know he should be accounting for >> What variables ? What exactly is wrong, functionally, with the Arduino ? > One of the main stacking connectors is offset .05" from the .1" grid > so you can't just stack an ordinary piece of protoboard on it. You > have to have special proto-shields that cost ten times as much. > =20 > And I don't want to write damn "sketches" in some damn Wiring > language with "setup()" and "loop()". =20 > I want to write programs in C (or C++) with "main()". So close, how > could they miss that last little bit to get to the standard? Most GUI frameworks use a similar structure, no 'main' function and one or two functions to setup and run your code. Most frameworks require that you derive a class for your application, with some predefined methods. Isaac --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .