On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:48 PM, V G wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:43 PM, V G wrote: > >> Adding any on the fly compression is going to inherently add some latenc= y >> (maybe a lot depending on the level of compression). Is this acceptable = for >> your application? But yeah, an encoder chip sounds good. If not, you mig= ht >> need an FPGA or second PIC32 dedicated to the encoding. Select lowest le= vel >> of compression for the least demand placed on the PIC32's resources. >> > > Check this one out: > > http://www.vlsi.fi/en/products/vs1063.html > > http://verkkokauppa.planeetta.net/epages/Planeetta.sf/en_GB/?ObjectPath=3D/= Shops/vlsi/Categories/%22Circuits%20and%20KITs%22/VS1063 Ooooh 25 euros/pounds/white people money/whatever that symbol is for qty 1-99. This baby don't come cheap. Is it really worth the cost of the chip? Or the trouble in porting complex encoding software to the PIC? Java applet is suddenly looking pretty good now :P --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .