Better in what way though?  Just easier-to-use/intuitive, or smaller =20
code size, or...?



Quoting Vicent Colomar Prats <vicentecolomar@gmail.com>:

> I tried it and my overall impression was better than with CCS. Now I have
> not time for it, as I'm busy with "other things", but plan to take it aga=
in
> later.
>
> 2011/9/6 PICdude <picdude3@narwani.org>
>
>> Would you care to comment on it's stability & "bug-free-ness"?  And if
>> you have any size comparisons between this and any other compiler (or
>> even MPASM), that would be nice.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Neil.
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
>> View/change your membership options at
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>



--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.