On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 09:59:55 -0400, M. Adam Davis wrote:
:: If you want a hardware specific license, then your best bet is to
:: modify the existing gpl-like hardware licenses to remove the
:: derivative (and attribution, if you don't want your users to have
:: to
:: distribute the license and/or your name along with their products)
:: portion from the license.

This may sound flippant, but it isn't meant to be.=20

Surely altering someone elses licence would be breaching their or an=20
organisations implicit copyright?

I always have this problem, I understand what copyright and patenting is=20
for and yet in practise I find it confusing.

Colin
--
cdb, colin@btech-online.co.uk on 21/08/2011
=20
Web presence: www.btech-online.co.uk =20
=20
Hosted by:  www.justhost.com.au
=20
=20
This email is to be considered private if addressed to a named  individual=
=20
or HR department, and public if addressed to a blog,  forum or news=20
article.
=20
=20
=20



--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.