On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:34:41AM -0400, Peter Johansson wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Vitaliy wrote: >=20 > > Say you wanted to publish schematics & gerbers, and did not want to res= trict > > their use in any form. Which license would you choose? GPL doesn't fit = the > > bill because it forces whoever uses the files, to publish derivative wo= rks. >=20 > Have you considered the TAPR Open Hardware License? >=20 > I am working on a project I intend to release with an OHL, so I am > very interested to hear what people say on this topic. Considering that Vitaliy had issues with forced publication of derivative works, and the OHR specifically requires sending copies of derivative works= to upstream developers, I doubt he would find this one useful. BAJ >=20 > -p. > --=20 > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 Byron A. Jeff Department Chair: IT/CS/CNET College of Information and Mathematical Sciences Clayton State University http://cims.clayton.edu/bjeff --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .