Em 7/8/2011 16:42, Michael Watterson escreveu: > Matt Bennett wrote: >> On Sun, August 7, 2011 12:19 pm, Michael Watterson wrote: >> =20 >>> On 07/08/2011 15:50, Matt Bennett wrote: >>> =20 >>>> Or maybe it should be [AD], but I'm not really trying to sell to the >>>> folks >>>> on this list- I'd probably send some of these to you folks for the cos= t >>>> of >>>> shipping/packaging... though thanks to the export complexities/ITAR, I= 'm >>>> not going to ship outside of the US. >>>> =20 >>> Export Complexities? >>> >>> Doesn't USA want to make money? >>> =20 >> Yes, though the devices I want to sell are probably not on the USML list >> (see >> = ). >> I don't have any way to certify compliance, and the penalties if you scr= ew >> up (even if by accident) just aren't worth the risk. >> >> I'm not saying I agree or disagree with export limitations,=20 > I think it only means you can't sell direct to Iran, North Korea etc? > AND only applies if the company or parts deals with Embargoed Items? > > I'm curious. Maybe someone else on the list can clarify. A very few US=20 > companies asked me to agree a disclaimer that I wasn't a Terrorist,=20 > Making Nukes, or dealing with Iran, North Korea etc. > > Not that I want to to buy 200 tone filter modules, but it's the first=20 > I've heard of these regulations creating a problem for ordinary people=20 > or parts exports from USA. Despite my whinging about carriage, I have =20 > bought electronics and parts relatively frequently from USA. Not heavy= =20 > things mind. Once I tried to buy some Atmel XMega MCUs and Digikey (or Mouser, I don't remember) didn't accept my order because those devices have hardware cryptographic modules. And I don't even live in an embargoed country, I live in Brazil. Isaac --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .