On Jul 25, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Charles Craft wrote:

> Typical customer - not giving all details. :-)
> I should have added that a "skinny dip" (like the 16F84) is preferred to=
=20
> save space on
> a breadboard or to make PCB layout easier.
>=20
> The 16F1825/1829 is a real beast in a small package for about a $1.
> The 16F690 looks like a nice step up from the 16f628A in a slightly=20
> longer package.
>=20
> Thanks!
>=20
> On 7/25/2011 11:41 AM, Wouter van Ooijen wrote:
>>> I teach a class in Microcontroller development
>>> at the local university and I use the 16F690 because it has a fairly fu=
ll
>>> range of peripherals, but it's also cheap and can be programmed with th=
e
>>> inexpensive PicKit programmer.
>>>=20
>> I teach such a class too, I use the 18F887 because its is the 'latest,
>> hottest' 40-pin DIP 14-bit (un-enhanced) core chip.
>>=20
>>=20

I would suggest 18F25K22.
28 Pin, LOTS of resources.

Tom

  *
  |  __O    Thomas C. Sefranek  wa1rhp@comcast.net
  |_-\<,_   Amateur Radio Operator: WA1RHP
  (*)/ (*)  Bicycle mobile on 145.41 MHz.

ARRL Instructor, Technical Specialist, VE Contact.

http://www.harvardrepeater.org

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.