On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Oli Glaser <oli.glaser@talktalk.net> wrote:
> Thanks very much for the suggestions.
> I read the document Xiaofan suggested, and it seems WinUSB (or LibUSB)
> is the preferred option for new projects.
> I think I will give WinUSB a go with LibUsbDotNet, which sounds like
> just what I was asking for (a ready rolled C# library)
>

Yes I think this is a good choice. libusbdotnet may not be that easy to
be used though (but I do not know much about C#), be sure to
follow the documentation and the examples.

When you hit some limitations of WinUSB, it can be easy to
switch to libusb0.sys if you use libusbdotnet.

Travis and I are busy with libusbk which is the next-gen
libusb-win32. The kernel driver libusbk.sys can be a drop-in
replacement for winusb.sys and libusb0.sys. The library
libusbk.dll is compatible with winusb.sys/libusb0.sys/libusk.sys.
libusbk.sys will work with libusbdotnet as well. It is not ready
for the mass yet but hopefully soon.
http://code.google.com/p/usb-travis/


--=20
Xiaofan
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.