On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, V G wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:05 PM, smplx wrote: > >>> Thanks! Open/close on an as-needed basis it will be, then. But at any >> rate, >>> it's a small project with only a few users (not more than two or three = at >>> the same time) so I won't be exhausting any modern SQL server no matter >> how >>> bad I code it. >> >> FAMOUS LAST WORDS! >> >> :-) >> > > Hahaha that's pretty funny. > > ...but no. > > Modern servers can handle MANY connections. I'll have to *try* to make it > crash. > >> FAMOUS LAST WORDS! > > I hate when people say that. You can expect with a reasonable level of > certainty that whatever you're working with won't crash as long as you're > operating within its specifications. That's they key. > > And I am operating within specifications. > Ah my appologies, you obviously know much more about programming than I=20 do. Friendly Regards Sergio Masci http://www.xcprod.com .. --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .