On 6/29/2011 10:53 AM, Byron Jeff wrote:
> Bob,
>
> It should be too difficult to generate some test code and see what assemb=
ly
> the compiler outputs. Since the JAL libaraies are written in JAL, and not
> assembly, if the optimizations are done for any piece of code, then they'=
ll
> be done for the libraries too upon compilation.
>
> BAJ
Great idea, Byron. I have now realized how important this is!=20
PIC16F1823, -1826, -1827, -1933  thru.-1939,
-1946 and -1947, even the PIC12F1822,  _ALL_ have the new language changes!

I am getting too OLD to keep writing in MPASM, so I will go ahead and=20
code in JALv2, then as I debug
each routine I'll study the JAL primitives as I find errors..Sound OK,=20
Rob H?

I like the PIC12F1822, it can be a heap I2C-driven UART, as it runs at=20
32M and just costs $1..

--Bob A
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.