>> Presumably, whatever the answer, what he does there is consistent with
>> what he would like to see being done here. No?

> I don't think Olin would object to posting here if (for instance) you
> were subjected to the same scrutiny executed by him, or if everyone was
> subjected to that scrutiny.

Can you explain, in terms that are specific enough for it to be clear
without iteration, what scrutiny I have not been subjected to that
Olin has been. You may argue if desired that I am not subject to my
own scrutiny. As Bob notes, there are 9 admins (not all liable to
shown their faces at any given occasion) and as I note, ultimately one
ultra benevolent "dictator". I and Olin are equally subject to these.

I have been known to have quiet words with list members off list. And
with admins (more than one). The latter usually end up less quiet than
the former.

Are you suggesting that eg I lack objectivity? You are entirely
welcome to do so and I'll happily examine any suggestions. Anatomical
ones are unlikely to be entertained. Suggestions that I get my
technology from the discovery channel may go down worse. (A very angry
gentleman, for reasons I never understood. Now not an option alas. ).




          Russell
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.