Bob Blick wrote:
>> His banishment is a symptom of a larger problem. The PICList has too muc=
h
>> sensorship and abuse of power, and too little transparency.
>>
>> I think what I hate the most, is the KGB-style, behind-the-scenes action=
s
>> taken by the admins.
>>
>> A less tyrannical PICList alternative doesn't sound like such a bad idea=
..
>
> The Piclist is already about as close to your idea of perfect as it is
> possible to be.

It has never been further from "my" idea of perfect. My idea of "perfect"=20
would have a lot more freedom, transparency, and a consistent application o=
f=20
rules. Oh, and in "my" idea of "perfect", admins who verbally abuse list=20
members (on- and off-list), would not be "above the law".


> It is definitely not a tyranny, as any one of the admins can attest to.
> None of us are "happy".

LOL -- so in a tyranny, everyone is happy? :)


> At least you didn't compare me to Hitler this time.

At least you didn't refer to me as "scum" and "enemy of the state" this=20
time. :)


> Start your own list if you like. Let the market decide :)

Ha-ha. Why didn't YOU take this approach, when YOU weren't happy with the=20
list governance? :)


--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.