On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Josh Koffman wrote: > FWIW, what I'd like to see happen is someone (as mentioned, probably > Russell) talking to SW about his behaviour. I find it extremely > troublesome that he feels the need/right to express himself in that > way. I don't think that's ok, though I don't know how we, as on list > administrators could control that short of banning him. Our addresses > are probably freely available in many places on the net, so he could > lash out even if he wasn't a subscriber. > > I too feel it would be courteous to let Andrew know that we've been > looking into the situation, and that we're sorry it happened. I think > it's fair to say that we're trying to monitor things and influence > them without creating another potential blow up, either on list or > off. Mentioning that since the comments were off list that we're > trying to exert influence without overtly punishing someone for a > private email is something that could be included or excluded. > > I agree with Russell in that moderation wouldn't have helped this, and > in my opinion banning him is probably a fruitless action. I would vote > for a diplomatic approach in dealing with his ongoing actions. > > Josh > > Lovely to see that you guys are conspiring against me. Just so you know, I am not your underling, your student or pupil or anyone you might think you can control/discipline/teach or take responsibility of. I find it disgusting. --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .