jim@jpes.com wrote 2011-06-21 15:45:
>
>   jan-erik,
>
>   The code could be written the way you show, but it doesn't have to be.
>

Not could, should. There is absolutely no reason at all to
write it as you did. Yes, maybe it does "work", but... :-)

>   I agree that normally you should use symbols for addresses, but in this
>   case, I chose addresses because I was troubleshooting a problem.

The wrong way to troubleshoot. If you realy have to verify an
address, check the processor INC file or the list/map files.
Using hardcoded addresses actualy makes the troubleshooting *harder*.

And yes, I know that it was all solved before I posted... :-)
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.