Bob Blick wrote:

> On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:51 -0300, "Gerhard Fiedler" wrote:
>>=20
>>> It's also pretty much left to the user to figure out.
>>=20
>> That's right. OTOH, looking at the appropriate section in the
>> processor include file, the respective pages in the processor
>> manual, and the examples that come with your compiler version (not
>> the internet :), you can't go too wrong.
>=20
> No, in fact _my_ PICC manual says nothing about the second __CONFIG
> macro line.=20

You say at least two things here; one that I can agree with, and one
that just doesn't make sense.=20

"in fact _my_ PICC manual says nothing about the second __CONFIG macro
line": That may well be, and AIUI I said as much when I started my
comment with "that's right".=20

"No": No what? Between "processor include file", "processor manual" and
"example code" I don't see how what the PICC manual says or doesn't say
has anything to do with what I wrote.

Maybe it's just the expression of a negative predisposition?

Gerhard
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.