I would evaluate SoureBoost as well as ByteCraft MPC. Not sure about the
pricing and if any of these would meet your requirements, but speak to them
and give them a go.

Tamas




On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:47 PM, PICdude <picdude3@narwani.org> wrote:

> Wasn't aware that Microchip acquired HiTech, but for the 16F and
> enhanced 16F, is there any better option?  I'm tinkering for now, but
> will prob want optimizations at some point and wondering if there's a
> better less-than-$1200 option out there.  Especially since I
> understand that the 16F version is limited to the 16F, and if I want
> to use if for the 18F or 24F, I have to buy additional versions for
> those.
>
> Cheers,
> -Neil.
>
>
> Quoting Tamas Rudnai <tamas.rudnai@gmail.com>:
>
> > Just as a side note: Since Microchip acquired HiTech, some names and
> defines
> > changed in the header files, so old projects would not compile at all.
> Many
> > people actually turnes off from PICC because of that (no reason changin=
g
> > these without backward compatibility).
> >
> > Tamas
>
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>



--=20
int main() { char *a,*s,*q; printf(s=3D"int main() { char *a,*s,*q;
printf(s=3D%s%s%s, q=3D%s%s%s%s,s,q,q,a=3D%s%s%s%s,q,q,q,a,a,q); }",
q=3D"\"",s,q,q,a=3D"\\",q,q,q,a,a,q); }
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.