On 01/06/2011 16:55, RussellMc wrote:
>> >  Photo sites that "own" your photos.
> I've never seen that.
> I'd be VERY interested in knowing which attempt that.
>
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/01/twitpic_terms_and_conditions/

Also most people don't understand "creative commons"

Plain ole copyright under Geneva convention and than specifying terms is=20
good enough for me unless it's software sources I'm giving away and then=20
I'll use BSD free, Zlib, Apache or whatever depending on context to keep=20
the recipient happy :-)

>> >  Also of course Facebook, Twitter, Google etc don't really want people=
 to
>> >  be private or have private stuff.

> For those who really care, Facebook can be annoyingly private. It's
> mainly that most people don't set theirs up that way.
>
They deliberately make privacy an obscure hard to do thing. Of course if=20
you want privacy why have a facebook account.

There are numerous pitfalls with Facebook in terms of how do you share=20
stuff with some people and not some others... It's not designed for easy=20
to use complex security.


--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.