On 01/06/2011 09:06, V G wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Oli Glaser wro= te: > >> I have just revised my initial thoughts on MPLABX. I was wondering what >> others think of it too. >> >> I have found the debugging (with ICD3) to be pretty flaky. The ICD3 >> frequently hangs and you have to unplug it and plug it back in. It also >> seems to be pretty bad with the breakpoints, and looked like it was >> giving the wrong values for a few of them. >> I base this on the fact that I tried the exact same >> code/project/compiler/settings in MPLAB 8.7 and I get the right (i.e. >> expected) values for stuff and it hits pretty much all the breakpoints. >> I might be doing something wrong of course... >> >> Anyone experienced similar problems? >> What do people think in general of it? >> I think it looks great and I could really use some of the features, but >> I can't afford to be worrying about whether it's "telling me the truth" >> or having the ICD3 hang all the time (about 10 times in 2 hours) >> So I think I'll leave it until it's had a few more wrinkles ironed out >> of it, unless anyone tells a completely different story. >> >> > I don't have anything valuable to add. I didn't use the debugging > capabilities, just C32 programming - and for that, it's great. Yes, most of it does seem to work well and is nice to use. It's just the=20 few problems I noticed that prevent me from feeling "comfortable" using=20 it right now. --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .