On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Oli Glaser wrote= : > I have just revised my initial thoughts on MPLABX. I was wondering what > others think of it too. > > I have found the debugging (with ICD3) to be pretty flaky. The ICD3 > frequently hangs and you have to unplug it and plug it back in. It also > seems to be pretty bad with the breakpoints, and looked like it was > giving the wrong values for a few of them. > I base this on the fact that I tried the exact same > code/project/compiler/settings in MPLAB 8.7 and I get the right (i.e. > expected) values for stuff and it hits pretty much all the breakpoints. > I might be doing something wrong of course... > > Anyone experienced similar problems? > What do people think in general of it? > I think it looks great and I could really use some of the features, but > I can't afford to be worrying about whether it's "telling me the truth" > or having the ICD3 hang all the time (about 10 times in 2 hours) > So I think I'll leave it until it's had a few more wrinkles ironed out > of it, unless anyone tells a completely different story. > > I don't have anything valuable to add. I didn't use the debugging capabilities, just C32 programming - and for that, it's great. --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .