On 29/05/2011 23:58, Olin Lathrop wrote:
> RussellMc wrote:
>> >  This started as OT
>> >  Certainly too 'good' for OT. Properly retagged by Olin
>> >  He chose TECH.
>> >  I think this sort of material would be better in [EE].
> I didn't use EE since it didn't have enough electronic component to it in=
 my
> opinion.

It's one of those that's a bit of OT, a bit TECH and a bit EE.
I think TECH was okay, just as relevant as EE - maybe more so. I don't=20
think OT was appropriate.
Unless we have more tags with more specific scope this will probably=20
just have to be accepted occasionally.
We are not all going to agree on what should go where every time.




--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.