Jeff Stevens wrote:
> Yes, my focus is more on the specifics of C18 than the chip itself.
> The PIC18 is so similar to the PIC16 and microchip's data sheets are
> specific to the point of repetitiveness.  As a result of your urging
> to go back to the C18 manual, I actually printed it out to make it a
> bit more useful.   However, there are still reasons I'm looking for a
> book.  While it may be a good reference manual, it's just that.  No
> different than referring to Harbison and Steele for standard C.  They
> book I'm looking for is something like a bunch of application notes,
> stylistic samples, and explanations of how to do a few of the things
> that seem so trivial in assembler but have no obvious solution in C18.

I don't understand.  If you know how C18 works, you should be able to
synthesize anything you want to do from the tools it makes available.  This
is no different from knowing the instruction set and the machine
architecture to synthesize what you want to do in MPASM.

What specifically do you want to do that you don't know how?


********************************************************************
Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, http://www.embedinc.com/products
(978) 742-9014.  Gold level PIC consultants since 2000.
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.