On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:37 PM, V G wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Chris McSweeny wr= ote: >> >> That's not an ad-hom attack! > > I don't know what that word means, and I didn't say it was. All I'm > saying is it is an attack on the OP. It was an attack on what the OP said, not on the OP - the distinction is very important. If you don't understand the original point I was making, why reply to it? Chris --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .