Olin, as far as I can recall we had a discussion about this very topic about a while ago. I can see that your attitude has changed from then on this topic and I congratulate you for being open minded. This approach is more appropriate for a man at your wisdom. On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Olin Lathrop wr= ote: > Isaac Marino Bavaresco wrote: >> Why do people insist on the perpetual motion engine? > > Shhh, don't tell anyone else they'll come after you and do a brain suck. > >> It violates the laws of thermodynamics, > > Yes, the supposed "laws" written by the very same people profiting from B= ig > Oil that won't tolerate mention of free energy. > >> do they think they know something about >> physics that all the serious cientists don't? > > Take a look at who pays these "serious scientist". =A0They're all in on i= t > trying to keep us dependent on The Machine forever. > >> Do they believe that >> every government agency in the world conspire to keep this truth >> hidden? > > You've said too much already. =A0Put on your tinfoil hat quickly. > > Free energy is all around us, in water, magnets, > > I hear someone coming, gotta go. > > > ******************************************************************** > Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, http://www.embedinc.com/products > (978) 742-9014. =A0Gold level PIC consultants since 2000. > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .