2011/4/5 Adam Field > > It really depends on what you call a GLCD. If it is a "serial GLCD" wit= h > > intelligence already embedded, then you should be fine with a 16F628, a= s > you > > would need to send simple commands and the GLCD will do everything. > However, > > if it is a kind of standard GLCD with no embedded functionality other > than > > setting a pixel on/off, then you need to implement arithmetic in your P= IC > to > > draw lines, circles, etc. All this takes significant RAM/ROM (significa= nt > > for what a PIC16F628) so you better go with a PIC16F2620 general purpos= e > > PIC. > > > > I would go a step further and use an 18F series, since it has hardware > multiply and divide capability. Unless you have personal reasons to > use the 16F series to get this job done, the price difference between > 16F and 18F is negligible and can even favor the 18F series. > > Concur. Actually I meant PIC18F2620, not PIC16F2620 which doesn't actually exist... --=20 Ariel Rocholl http://www.rf-explorer.com --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .