> Let's say that due to optics, more than 80 lines/mm is pointless. =A0That= is > 160 pix/mm, or 5760 x 3840 =3D 22 Mpix for a 36mm x 24mm "35mm" frame. = =A0That > would also be the resolution for each color. =A0We're not there yet. =A0M= aybe in > another decade the practical resolution limit will be hit for professiona= l > 35mm cameras and it will only be about sensitivity, dynamic range, and > noise. Understood, but lenses really are already a limiting factor for top photographers, and a significant factor for the kenner of the hoi polloi. There are reasons why people can and do sell. $1000, $3000 and $6000 lenses. Not quite so much reason why they do and can sell $10,000, $30,000 and more lenses (except in > 35mm formats where anything goes) Getting a GOOD result at all apertures and focal lengrths is MUCH harder and dearer on a full frame 35mm than on an APSC half frame. Once you get into the world of MTF (modulation transfer function) (wot's lenses got to do with modulation then ???) and its kin you are in a brave new (or very old world) where people will pore over results interminably. MTF Explained Do I really need to know this stuff THEIR titles ! :-) Excellent site BTW http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/understanding-series/un= derstanding-mtf.shtml Contrast and MTF basics http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/understanding-series/lens-c= ontrast.shtml MTF curves Aghhhhhhhhhhh! http://www.normankoren.com/Tutorials/MTF.html And again http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/lens-quality-mtf-resolution.htm How to choose the lens you need using MTF charts. Walker! http://fotogenetic.dearingfilm.com/how_to_choose_a_lens.html Messieur Rockwell. (Many roads lead via) http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mtf.htm http://www.photodo.com/ http://www.quickmtf.com/ Interesting but dangerous table http://www.waynesthisandthat.com/bestcameralensbrand.html --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .