Em 25/3/2011 19:10, Olin Lathrop escreveu:
> Isaac Marino Bavaresco wrote:
>>> OK, so you use a single erase block somewhere with individual bits
>>> corresponding to uploaded blocks.
>> Not bits, one word per block, because I can program a minimum of one
>> word at a time.
>> It is a little wasteful but that doesn't matter at all because there
>> is plenty of unused FLASH.
> If you have the space it doesn't matter, but you can write individual bit=
s
> since you'd only be flipping them from 1 to 0.


I'm not sure if it is safe to write each word more than once without
erasing, even to just turn bits from 1 to 0.


>> The word programming is to mark each entry of the received-block list.
> As I thought, this isn't really part of the bootload process.  This is a
> function of the uploader, some of the code of which you apparently put in
> the bootloader module.


Call it as you like, but when this routine saves the last block, it
transfers the firmware to its final location and resets the processor.


Isaac

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.