RussellMc wrote:
>
> This will be completely familiar to the experts.
> What they conclude or how much we hear at populist level is tbd.
>

I don't think there is much sense in getting deeper in the topic. If
you had said in your first post about the Kaikoura Canyon, that there
was a 4+M shake in the region, I, most probably had avoided the
prediction.  The idea of it is on the surface, get the timespan
between first 2 quakes to calculate the third. Just a speculation,
probably is not the best thing to be posted on the public forum,
sorry.
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.