Olin Lathrop wrote:
> N. T. wrote:
>> Sometimes, depending on text typing
>> and reading options, typing correctly and checking out the typed in
>> text may be a problem even for native English speaker.
>
> Anyone can at least quickly look over what they wrote. =A0Whether you lik=
e it
> or not, you are constantly judged by what you write and how you write it.
>

Yes, one is judged by what he/she write, and yes, one can at least
quickly look over what he/she  wrote, the problem is that, still, the
probability of the mistake is not zero.
Talking about the list, I'd say one is to balance between 2
approaches, I'd call them optimistic and pessimistic styles of
posting.
The optimistic - is the one when a user assumes, the mistakes will be
forgiven, so he could concentrate more on creativity and productivity.
The pessimistic - is the one when a user thinks that the cost of the
mistake will be too high. In this case he talks a little trying not to
make a mistake and not to say anything that can be interpreted
negatively. I tend to agree that the second approach fits better the
global list, but you know, without the ability to be creative there is
no much sense to post for some.

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.